What is the Difference Between Absorbance and Fluorescence?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Absorbance and fluorescence are both analytical techniques used to detect and measure substances in various fields, but they differ in several aspects:
- Definition: Absorbance is a measure of the capacity of a substance to absorb light of a specific wavelength. Fluorescence, on the other hand, is the emission of light from a substance that has absorbed energy previously.
- Sensitivity: The most sensitive spectrophotometer can detect as low as 0.75 nanograms per microliter of sample. Fluorescence analysis assays can detect 0.005 nanograms per microliter of sample.
- Dynamic Range: Absorbance has a higher dynamic range than fluorescence, capable of detecting up to 37,500 nanograms per microliter. Fluorescence has a lower dynamic range, able to detect up to 4,000 nanograms per microliter.
- Sample Preparation: Absorbance does not require sample preparation, as no dilution or assay preparation is necessary. Fluorescence requires sample preparation, with the sample of interest being bound with fluorescent reagents in an assay kit.
- Contamination Detection: Many contaminants can be identified using absorbance measurement across an array of wavelengths. Fluorescence is unable to identify contamination within a sample.
- Effectiveness: Fluorescence is more effective than absorbance due to the highly specific nature of the assay.
In summary, absorbance spectroscopy measures the absorption of light, while fluorescence spectroscopy measures the emission of light after absorption. Both techniques are used in life science laboratories, but they have distinct differences in sensitivity, dynamic range, sample preparation, contamination detection, and effectiveness.
Comparative Table: Absorbance vs Fluorescence
Here is a table comparing the differences between absorbance and fluorescence:
Absorbance | Fluorescence |
---|---|
Measures the absorption of light by a substance at specific wavelengths | Measures the emission of light from a substance that has absorbed energy previously |
Less effective due to the technique not being sample-specific | More effective because the assay is highly specific |
Detects contaminants using absorbance measurement across an array of wavelengths | Unable to identify contamination within a sample |
Requires no sample preparation (no dilution or assay preparation necessary) | Requires sample preparation (sample of interest must be bound with fluorescent reagents) |
The most sensitive spectrophotometer can detect as low as 0.75 nanograms per microliter | Can detect 0.005 nanograms per microliter of sample |
Has a higher dynamic range than fluorescence (able to detect 37,500 nanograms per microliter) | Has a lower dynamic range than absorbance (able to detect up to 4,000 nanograms per microliter) |
Both absorbance and fluorescence analysis are used to detect and quantify analytes in a sample, but they have distinct differences in terms of sensitivity, sample preparation, and effectiveness.
- Absorptance vs Absorbance
- Absorbance vs Transmittance
- Fluorescence vs Luminescence
- Chemiluminescence vs Fluorescence
- Photoluminescence vs Fluorescence
- Optical Density vs Absorbance
- Fluorescence vs Phosphorescence
- Absorption Spectrum vs Emission Spectrum
- Emission vs Absorption Spectra
- Flame Emission Spectroscopy vs Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
- Bioluminescence vs Fluorescence
- UV Vis vs Fluorescence Spectroscopy
- X-ray Diffraction vs X-ray Fluorescence
- Fluorescence Microscopy vs Confocal Microscopy
- Spectrophotometer vs Spectrofluorometer
- Fluorescence vs Phosphorescence vs Luminescence
- Molar Absorptivity vs Specific Absorbance
- Atomic Absorption vs Atomic Emission
- Absorption vs Adsorption