What is the Difference Between Assembler and Compiler?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between a compiler and an assembler lies in the type of code they convert and the level of intelligence they possess. Here are the key differences between the two:
- Function: A compiler is used to convert high-level programming language code (e.g., C, C++, Java) into machine language code, while an assembler converts assembly level language code into machine language code.
- Intelligence: A compiler is considered more intelligent than an assembler because it can perform tasks such as optimization and error checking. In contrast, an assembler is less intelligent and only converts assembly language code into machine code.
- Conversion Process: The entire code is converted into machine language at the same time in the case of a compiler, while an assembler converts the code line by line.
- Input and Output: A compiler takes high-level programming code as input and outputs a mnemonic version of machine code, while an assembler takes assembly level code as input and outputs binary code.
- Phases: A compiler has multiple phases, including syntax analysis, semantic analysis, intermediate code generation, code optimization, code generation, and error handling. An assembler has only two phases: the first phase detects errors in the input code, and the second phase starts execution after the errors are fixed.
In summary, a compiler is responsible for converting high-level programming language code into machine language code, while an assembler converts assembly level language code into machine language code. Compilers are more intelligent and perform various tasks, such as optimization and error checking, whereas assemblers are less intelligent and focus on converting assembly language code to machine code.
Comparative Table: Assembler vs Compiler
Here is a table comparing the differences between an assembler and a compiler:
Feature | Compiler | Assembler |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Converts high-level programming language code into machine language code | Converts assembly-level code into machine-level code |
Input | Source code written by the programmer | Assembly language code |
Output | Mnemonic version of machine code | Binary code |
Execution Time | Faster than an assembler | Slower than a compiler |
Error Detection and Handling | Shows the whole program error after the whole program is scanned | Detects errors in the first phase, fixes them, and then the second phase is started to execute |
Intelligence | More intelligent than an assembler | Less intelligent than a compiler |
Examples of Languages | C, C++, Java, C# | GAS (GNU Assembler) |
Examples of Compilers | C++ is an example of a compiled language | GNU is an example of an assembler |
A compiler is responsible for converting high-level programming language code into machine language code, while an assembler translates assembly-level code into machine-level code. The compiler's output is a mnemonic version of machine code, whereas the assembler's output is binary code. Compilers are generally more intelligent than assemblers and have a faster execution time.
- Assembler vs Interpreter
- Debugger vs Compiler
- Machine Language vs Assembly Language
- Assembly vs DLL
- Compile Time vs Runtime
- Linker vs Loader
- Interpreter vs Translator
- Phase vs Pass in Compiler
- Source Code vs Bytecode
- ALU vs CPU
- C vs C++
- Processor vs Microprocessor
- RISC vs CISC processor
- C vs C#
- C vs Embedded C
- Encoder vs Decoder
- Computer Science vs Computer Engineering
- CPU vs GPU
- Source Code vs Object Code