What is the Difference Between CGH and Array CGH?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and array CGH (also known as aCGH) are molecular cytogenetic techniques used to detect chromosomal copy number changes on a genome-wide scale. The main difference between the two methods lies in the target used for analysis and the resolution they offer.
CGH:
- Uses metaphase chromosomes as the target for analysis.
- Has a lower resolution, typically limited to alterations of approximately 5-10 Mb.
- Does not require cells undergoing division.
Array CGH:
- Uses slides arrayed with small segments of DNA (such as oligonucleotides, cDNAs, or genomic fragments cloned in various vectors) as the targets for analysis.
- Offers a higher resolution, with the standard resolution varying between 1 and 5 Mb, and the ability to increase up to approximately 40 kb by supplementing the array with extra clones.
- Also does not require cells undergoing division.
Both CGH and array CGH compare the patient's genome against a reference genome to identify differences and locate chromosomal imbalances. However, array CGH overcomes the limitation of low resolution associated with conventional CGH by replacing metaphase chromosomes with smaller, well-defined DNA segments. This results in a higher resolution and the ability to detect smaller chromosomal alterations.
Comparative Table: CGH vs Array CGH
CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization) and Array CGH are two molecular cytogenetic techniques used to detect unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in individuals. Here is a table comparing the differences between CGH and Array CGH:
Feature | CGH | Array CGH |
---|---|---|
Method | Traditional molecular cytogenetic method | Fully automated molecular cytogenetic method |
Resolution | Lower resolution (10 Mb) | Higher resolution (50 - 100 Kb) |
Technique | Uses fluorescence to compare test and reference DNA samples | Uses microarray technology to analyze copy number variations |
Sensitivity | Less sensitive compared to Array CGH | More sensitive and reliable compared to CGH |
Detection of Variations | Detects large segments of the genome with copy number changes | Detects small and large segments of the genome with copy number changes |
Applications | Widely used in comparative genomic analysis and detecting genetic disorders due to copy number variations | Widely used in comparative genomic analysis and detecting genetic disorders due to copy number variations |
In summary, CGH is a traditional method for analyzing copy number variations, while Array CGH is a more advanced, fully automated technique with higher resolution and sensitivity. Both methods are used for comparative genomic analysis and detecting genetic disorders due to copy number variations.
- FISH vs CGH
- Microarray vs Next Generation Sequencing
- DNA vs Protein Microarray
- cDNA vs Genomic Library
- Microarray vs RNA Sequencing
- CGA vs CMA
- Gene vs Chromosome
- Capillary Electrophoresis vs Gel Electrophoresis
- Gene vs Genome
- Gene Mapping vs Gene Sequencing
- Pointer vs Array
- Gene vs DNA
- Hierarchical vs Whole Genome Shotgun Sequencing
- Genetics vs Genomics
- NGS vs WGS
- DNA vs cDNA
- Cytogenetics vs Molecular Genetics
- Genotyping vs Sequencing
- Gene Amplification vs Gene Cloning