What is the Difference Between Clemmensen and Wolff Kishner Reduction?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The Clemmensen and Wolff-Kishner reductions are both chemical reactions that involve the reduction of ketones and aldehydes, but they differ in their purpose, reaction conditions, and catalysts. Here are the main differences between the two reactions:
- Purpose: The Clemmensen reduction aims to convert ketones and aldehydes to alkanes, while the Wolff-Kishner reaction is used to convert carbon functional groups to methylene groups.
- Reaction Conditions: The Clemmensen reduction occurs under strongly acidic conditions, while the Wolff-Kishner reduction takes place under strongly basic conditions.
- Catalysts: The Clemmensen reduction requires a catalyst called fused zinc, whereas no catalyst is needed for the Wolff-Kishner reduction.
- Suitability: The Clemmensen reduction is unsuitable for acid-sensitive substrates, while the Wolff-Kishner reduction is not suitable for base-sensitive substrates.
In summary, the Clemmensen reduction focuses on converting ketones and aldehydes to alkanes under strongly acidic conditions using fused zinc as a catalyst. On the other hand, the Wolff-Kishner reduction converts carbon functional groups to methylene groups under strongly basic conditions without any catalyst.
Comparative Table: Clemmensen vs Wolff Kishner Reduction
Here is a table comparing the differences between the Clemmensen and Wolff-Kishner reductions:
Feature | Clemmensen Reduction | Wolff-Kishner Reduction |
---|---|---|
Reaction Type | Reduction of ketones or aldehydes to alkanes | Reduction of ketones or aldehydes to alkanes |
Reaction Conditions | Performed in strongly acidic conditions | Performed in strongly basic conditions with high heat |
Catalyst | Amalgamated zinc (mercury alloyed with zinc) with hydrochloric acid | Not applicable |
Reactant Scope | Works best for aromatic ketones | Suitable for a wider range of ketones and aldehydes |
Both the Clemmensen and Wolff-Kishner reductions are used to reduce aldehyde and ketone functional groups into alkanes. The main difference between the two is the reaction conditions: the Clemmensen reduction is performed under acidic conditions, while the Wolff-Kishner reduction is carried out under basic conditions with high heat. Additionally, the Clemmensen reduction requires a catalyst, amalgamated zinc (mercury alloyed with zinc) with hydrochloric acid, while the Wolff-Kishner reduction does not require a catalyst. The Clemmensen reduction works best for aromatic ketones, while the Wolff-Kishner reduction is suitable for a wider range of ketones and aldehydes.
- Wittig vs Wittig Horner Reaction
- Hofmann vs Curtius Rearrangement
- Fischer vs Schrock Carbene
- Cope vs Claisen Rearrangement
- Wittig Reaction vs Wittig Rearrangement
- Gattermann vs Gattermann Koch Reaction
- MPV Reduction vs Oppenauer Oxidation
- Finkelstein vs Swarts Reaction
- Oxidative Addition vs Reductive Elimination
- Mohr Volhard vs Fajans Method
- Fischer Projection vs Haworth Projection
- Sandmeyer Reaction vs Gattermann Reaction
- Hydrogenation vs Reduction
- Shine Dalgarno vs Kozak Sequence
- Equational Division vs Reduction Division
- Embden Meyerhof Pathway vs Entner Doudoroff Pathway
- Oxidation vs Reduction
- Reductive Amination vs Transamination
- Claisen vs Dieckmann Condensation