What is the Difference Between Constructivism and Social Constructivism?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Constructivism and social constructivism are two related but distinct learning theories. The main differences between them are:
- Focus: Constructivism, also known as individual constructivism, emphasizes individuals' personal experiences in constructing knowledge. In contrast, social constructivism focuses on the significance of social interactions in the learning process.
- Learning Process: Constructivism considers learning as an active process, where individuals construct knowledge based on their personal experiences. Social constructivism, on the other hand, highlights the role of social interactions in the learning process, emphasizing that knowledge and reality are constructed through discourse or conversation.
- Emphasis: Constructivism places the focus on the cognitive processes and biological aspects within individuals. Social constructivism, however, places knowledge in the domain of social interchange, emphasizing the importance of social interactions and collaboration in the learning process.
Despite these differences, both constructivism and social constructivism share some common features, such as the belief that knowledge and reality are constructed and not absolute. They also both stress the importance of active learning, where learners engage in the process of constructing knowledge through their experiences and interactions. In practice, the distinctions between constructivism and social constructivism may be blurred, as researchers often consider both cognitive and social processes in the learning process.
Comparative Table: Constructivism vs Social Constructivism
Constructivism and social constructivism are two educational philosophies that focus on the process of learning. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two:
Constructivism | Social Constructivism |
---|---|
Cognitive theory, focusing on how individuals mentally construct reality | Emphasizes learning through social interaction and the importance of cultural background |
Knowledge is constructed by the learner | Collaborative learning, with peers influencing one another's understanding |
Individual experiences play a significant role in constructing knowledge | Teacher acts as a "guide on the side" rather than a "sage on the stage" |
Role of the teacher is to provide opportunities for students to test the adequacy of their understanding | Greater emphasis on learning through social interaction and the value placed on cultural background |
In summary, both constructivism and social constructivism focus on the active construction of knowledge by learners. However, constructivism primarily emphasizes individual experiences in constructing knowledge, while social constructivism highlights the role of social interactions and cultural backgrounds in the learning process.
- Constructivism vs Constructionism
- Constructivism vs Cognitivism
- Positivism vs Constructivism
- Social Cognitive Theory vs Social Learning Theory
- Post-Structuralism vs Structuralism
- Piaget vs Vygotsky
- Structuralism vs Formalism
- Structuralism vs Functionalism
- Psychology vs Social Psychology
- Science vs Social Sciences
- Sociology vs Social Science
- Positivism vs Interpretivism
- Cultural vs Social
- Criticism vs Constructive Criticism
- Social Psychology vs Sociology
- Constructive vs Destructive Conflict
- Positivism vs Post-Positivism
- Pragmatism vs Progressivism
- Modernism vs Postmodernism