What is the Difference Between Conventional Testing and Object Oriented Testing?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between conventional testing and object-oriented testing lies in their approach and focus. Here are the key differences between the two testing methods:
Conventional Testing:
- Conventional testing is a software testing process conducted when the waterfall life cycle is used while developing software.
- It focuses on decomposition and functional approaches.
- The three levels of testing (system, integration, unit) are used in conventional testing.
- Conventional testing is often time-consuming and expensive, and may not detect all types of software defects or issues.
Object-Oriented Testing:
- Object-oriented testing is a software testing process that is conducted to test the software using encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, etc..
- It is based on the hierarchy of classes and well-defined objects.
- Object-oriented testing typically undergoes many levels of testing, from unit testing to system or acceptance testing.
- Unit testing in object-oriented testing focuses on testing individual objects or classes in isolation, while integration testing verifies that different objects or classes can work together.
In summary, conventional testing follows a more traditional approach, focusing on decomposition and functional approaches, while object-oriented testing is based on the hierarchy of classes and objects, and emphasizes testing individual objects or classes in isolation.
Comparative Table: Conventional Testing vs Object Oriented Testing
Here is a table that highlights the main differences between conventional testing and object-oriented testing:
Aspect | Conventional Testing | Object-Oriented Testing |
---|---|---|
Focus | Decomposition and functional approaches | Composition and object-based approaches |
Testing Levels | System, integration, and unit testing | Unit, integration, and system testing, with a focus on objects and classes |
Testing Phases | Performed during the test phase of the software development life cycle, following the development phase | Typically occurs during various phases of the software development life cycle, including object-oriented analysis and design |
Approach | Waterfall life cycle | Incremental approach, often used in conjunction with object-oriented analysis and design |
Testing Units | Larger units, focusing on system components and functionality | Smaller units, focusing on individual objects and classes |
Test Cases | Simulate different scenarios or inputs for the entire system or subsystems | Simulate different scenarios or inputs for individual objects or classes |
In summary, conventional testing focuses on decomposition and functional approaches, with larger units and a sequential approach. On the other hand, object-oriented testing emphasizes composition and object-based approaches, with smaller units and an incremental approach.
- Object Oriented Programming vs Procedural Programming
- Structured Programming vs Object Oriented Programming
- Static vs Dynamic Testing
- Conventional vs Traditional
- White-Box vs Black-Box Testing
- Objects vs Classes
- Retesting vs Regression Testing
- Source Code vs Object Code
- AOP vs OOP
- C vs Objective C
- Agile vs Traditional Software Development Methodology
- Performance Testing vs Load Testing
- Instructional Objectives vs Learning Objectives
- Goal vs Objective
- Subject vs Object
- Objective vs Subjective
- Outcomes vs Objectives
- Class Diagram vs Object Diagram
- Performance vs Load Testing