What is the Difference Between Covalent Organic and Metal Organic Framework?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) and Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) lies in the nodes that form their structures. COFs contain non-metal nodes, while MOFs contain metal atoms or clusters as nodes. Both COFs and MOFs are porous materials with high surface areas, but they have distinct properties and applications.
- COFs: Covalent Organic Frameworks form two- or three-dimensional structures through reactions between organic precursors, resulting in covalent bonding. These frameworks have covalent frameworks that allow them to transfer electrons through bonds and space. COFs are less common than MOFs, with fewer than 600 structures reported so far.
- MOFs: Metal Organic Frameworks are compounds containing metal ions or clusters that are coordinated, forming 2D or 3D structures. MOFs have metal centers and organic ligands that act as electron transfer sites. They are typically porous, with a high surface area, making them suitable for catalysis, storage, or adsorption of other molecules in the pores.
In summary, the key difference between COFs and MOFs is the presence of metal atoms or clusters in MOFs, while COFs have non-metal nodes. This distinction leads to different properties and applications for each type of framework.
Comparative Table: Covalent Organic vs Metal Organic Framework
Here is a table comparing the differences between Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) and Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs):
Property | Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) | Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) |
---|---|---|
Nodes | Non-metal nodes | Metal nodes or clusters |
Structure | Two or three-dimensional organic solids | One, two, or three-dimensional organic solids |
Building Blocks | Bonded to each other via strong covalent bonds | Linked by coordination bonds of moderate strength |
Porosity | Porous and crystalline | Porous and crystalline |
Conductivity | Insuulative | Conductive or semiconductive |
Applications | Hydrogen storage, methane storage, light harvesting, energy migration, carbon capture, electrocatalysis | Gas storage, separation, catalysis, drug delivery, sensing |
COFs are made of light elements, mainly hydrogen, and are synthesized using a boron condensation reaction. They have insulative properties and are used for applications such as hydrogen storage, methane storage, light harvesting, and carbon capture. On the other hand, MOFs contain metal atoms or clusters as nodes and are linked by coordination bonds of moderate strength. They can be conductive or semiconductive and are used for applications such as gas storage, separation, catalysis, drug delivery, and sensing.
- Organometallic Compounds vs Metal Carbonyls
- MOF vs COF
- Ionic Covalent vs Metallic Hydrides
- Organic vs Inorganic Molecules
- Molecular Solid vs Covalent Network Solid
- Coordination Compound vs Organometallic Compound
- Covalent vs Polar Covalent
- Inorganic vs Organic Carbon
- Electrovalency vs Covalency
- Organic Chemistry vs Inorganic Chemistry
- Organic Compound vs Inorganic Compound
- Organic vs Inorganic Polymers
- Molecular vs Metallic Hydrogen
- Ionic vs Covalent Bonds
- Zeolite vs MOF
- Organic vs Inorganic Catalysts
- Acyclic vs Cyclic Organic Compounds
- Electrovalent vs Covalent Bond
- Ionic vs Covalent Compounds