What is the Difference Between Ferrous Gluconate and Ferrous Fumarate?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Ferrous gluconate and ferrous fumarate are both iron supplements used to treat and prevent iron deficiency. The main difference between them lies in the amount of elemental iron they contain and their side effects.
- Ferrous Gluconate: This form of iron supplement has the lowest amount of elemental iron and is generally considered to have fewer side effects due to its lower iron content. It is an iron salt of gluconic acid.
- Ferrous Fumarate: This form of iron supplement contains a higher amount of elemental iron than ferrous gluconate. It is an iron salt of fumaric acid. While it may be more effective in treating iron deficiency, it can also cause more side effects due to its higher iron content.
Some key points to consider are:
- Ferrous fumarate has approximately 90mg of elemental iron, while ferrous gluconate has much less.
- Ferrous gluconate is generally considered to be gentler on the stomach and cause fewer side effects.
- The body can absorb both ferrous gluconate and ferrous fumarate as readily as it can ferrous sulfate.
It is essential to read the label closely when choosing an iron supplement, as the dosage is noted either as the amount of iron or the percentage of iron. If you experience any side effects or have concerns about which iron supplement is best for you, consult a healthcare professional for guidance.
Comparative Table: Ferrous Gluconate vs Ferrous Fumarate
Ferrous gluconate and ferrous fumarate are both iron supplements used to treat and prevent iron deficiency. They differ in their iron content and side effect profiles. Here is a table comparing the two:
Property | Ferrous Gluconate | Ferrous Fumarate |
---|---|---|
Iron Content | Approximately 30mg of elemental iron per dose | Approximately 90mg of elemental iron per dose |
Effectiveness | Both are equally effective in treating iron deficiency | Both are equally effective in treating iron deficiency |
Side Effects | Generally better tolerated than ferrous fumarate | May cause more side effects due to higher elemental iron content |
Bioavailability | Contains less elemental iron, which may result in slower absorption and fewer side effects | Has poor bioavailability and significant side effects |
Both ferrous gluconate and ferrous fumarate are used as iron supplements, but they differ in their iron content and side effect profiles. Ferrous gluconate generally has less elemental iron and is better tolerated, while ferrous fumarate has more elemental iron but may cause more side effects. The choice between the two depends on individual needs and tolerance.
- Ferrous Gluconate vs Ferrous Sulfate
- Ferrous Fumarate vs Ferrous Sulfate
- Iron Sulfate vs Iron Gluconate
- Ferrous Sulfate vs Iron Glycinate
- Ferric vs Ferrous Sulphate
- Iron vs Ferrous Sulfate
- Ferrous Sulphate vs Folic Acid
- Ferrous vs Ferric
- Magnesium Glycinate vs Magnesium Gluconate
- Zinc Gluconate vs Zinc Glycinate
- Zinc Gluconate vs Zinc Sulfate
- Zinc Citrate vs Zinc Gluconate
- Ferrous Sulphate vs Iron Polymaltose
- Carbonyl Iron vs Ferrous Sulfate
- Iron Sucrose vs Ferric Carboxymaltose
- Potassium Citrate vs Potassium Gluconate
- Potassium vs Potassium Gluconate
- Iron vs Ferritin
- Carbonyl Iron vs Ferrous Ascorbate