What is the Difference Between Fischer and Schrock Carbene?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between Fischer and Schrock carbenes lies in their electronic structures, reactivities, and the types of metal centers they typically feature.
Fischer carbenes (named after Ernst Otto Fischer) have the following characteristics:
- Feature strong π-acceptors at the metal
- Carbene carbon atom is electrophilic
- Typically contain low oxidation state metal centers, such as middle and late transition metals like iron, molybdenum, and cobalt
- Can undergo aldol-like reactions and have acidic hydrogen atoms attached to the carbon atom α to the carbene carbon atom
Schrock carbenes (named after Richard R. Schrock) have the following characteristics:
- Characterized by more nucleophilic carbene carbon centers
- Typically feature higher valent metals, such as early transition metals like titanium
- Formed with the metal centers having more electron-rich ligands
Due to their different electronic structures, the reactivities of Fischer and Schrock carbene complexes differ significantly. Fischer type carbene complexes undergo nucleophilic attack at the carbene carbon center, while Schrock type carbene complexes undergo electrophilic attack at the carbene carbon center.
Comparative Table: Fischer vs Schrock Carbene
Here is a table comparing the differences between Fischer and Schrock carbenes:
Property | Fischer Carbene | Schrock Carbene |
---|---|---|
Carbon Center | Weak back bonding metal center, usually a low oxidation state | Strong back bonding carbon center |
Carbon Ligands | Contains a π-chelating ligand | Contains a π-accepting ligand |
Synthesis | Developed in 1964, carbon is electrophilic, and common method is nucleophilic attack at a carbonyl ligand | Nucleophilic attack at a carbonyl ligand, α-abstraction in Schrock carbenes synthesis, induced by steric bulk |
Stability | Can be enhanced by highly electronegative heteroatoms, which participate in π-back bonding with d orbitals on the carbon | Less stable, alpha abstraction is typically present, and it is not stabilized by the participation of heteroatoms in π-back bonding |
Saturation | Saturated complexes | Unsaturated complexes |
Fischer carbenes have a weak back bonding metal center and are classified as saturated complexes, while Schrock carbenes have a strong back bonding carbon center and are classified as unsaturated complexes. The carbon in Fischer carbenes is electrophilic, while Schrock carbene carbon is nucleophilic.
- Carbene vs Carbanion
- Fischer Esterification vs Steglich Esterification
- Singlet vs Triplet Carbene
- Ferrocene vs Benzene
- Carbonyl vs Ketone
- Carbonyl vs Carboxyl
- Diamond Graphite vs Fullerene
- Carbocation vs Carbanion
- Finkelstein vs Swarts Reaction
- Schiff Base vs Schiff’s Reagent
- Chlorobenzene vs Chlorocyclohexane
- Carburizing vs Carbonitriding
- Graphene vs Carbon Fiber
- Classical vs Nonclassical Carbocation
- Friedel Crafts Acylation vs Alkylation
- Schottky Defect vs Frenkel Defect
- Terminal vs Bridging Carbonyls
- Creosote vs Carbolineum
- Hydrocarbons vs Carbohydrates