What is the Difference Between Fullerene and Carbon Nanotubes?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Fullerenes and carbon nanotubes are both allotropes of carbon, meaning they are different structural arrangements of carbon atoms. The key difference between fullerene and carbon nanotubes is their shape:
- Fullerene: Fullerenes can exist in different shapes, such as spherical, ellipsoid, or tubular shapes. The most common structure of fullerene is a spherical structure with a closed mesh made of fused rings of 5 or 7 atoms.
- Carbon Nanotubes: Carbon nanotubes are a type of fullerene with a cylindrical shape. They consist of tubular structures made up of carbon atoms, with each carbon atom having three covalent bonds. Carbon nanotubes can be single-walled or multi-walled, with the number of concentric cylinders in a given tube ranging from 3 to 50.
Both fullerenes and carbon nanotubes possess extraordinary thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties due to their hollow structure and covalent bonding. They have been the subject of much research and excitement regarding their potential applications, although such applications have been limited so far.
Comparative Table: Fullerene vs Carbon Nanotubes
Fullerenes and carbon nanotubes are both allotropes of carbon, but they have distinct differences in their structure and properties. Here is a table comparing the two:
Property | Fullerenes | Carbon Nanotubes |
---|---|---|
Shape | Spherical ("buckyballs"), ellipsoid, other | Cylindrical, tubular |
Structure | Closed or partially closed mesh of fused rings | Graphene sheet rolled into a tube, capped by half a fullerene |
Bonding | Each carbon atom connected to 3 neighbors | Each carbon atom connected to 3 neighbors |
Hybridization | sp² | sp² |
Conductivity | Can vary depending on surface modifications | Good conductors of electricity |
Tensile Strength | Not as high as carbon nanotubes | High tensile strength, can withstand high tension |
Melting Point | Low for some fullerenes like C₆₀ | Not applicable |
Application | Medical science, antimicrobial agents, imaging | Electronics, high-strength materials, energy storage |
Fullerenes, such as buckminsterfullerene (C₆₀), have a spherical or ellipsoid shape and can have weak intermolecular forces between molecules. Carbon nanotubes, on the other hand, have a cylindrical shape and are much longer than they are wide, giving them a high length-to-diameter ratio. Both fullerenes and carbon nanotubes have sp²-hybridized carbon atoms connected by covalent bonds. While fullerenes can have variable conductivity depending on surface modifications, carbon nanotubes are good conductors of electricity. Carbon nanotubes also have high tensile strength, making them useful for various applications in electronics and materials science.
- Carbon Nanotubes vs Graphene
- Diamond Graphite vs Fullerene
- Buckyballs vs Nanotubes
- Graphene vs Carbon Fiber
- Carbon Dots vs Quantum Dots
- Nanomaterials vs Nanoparticles
- Kevlar vs Carbon Fibre
- Silicon vs Carbon
- Graphite vs Graphene
- Aramid vs Carbon Fiber
- Carbon vs Graphite
- Nanomaterials vs Bulk Materials
- Carbon vs Diamond
- Nanotechnology vs Nanoscience
- Nanoparticles vs Nanoclusters
- Boron Nitride vs Graphite
- Silicon Carbide vs Boron Carbide
- Graphene vs Graphene Oxide
- Nanocrystalline vs Polycrystalline