What is the Difference Between Functionalism and Conflict Theory?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Functionalism and conflict theory are two major theoretical perspectives in sociology that differ in their views on social structure and social order. Here are the key differences between the two theories:
- Views of Structure and Order: Functionalism emphasizes the role of social institutions in providing stability and maintaining the social order, while conflict theory sees social institutions as causing injustice and domination of the powerful.
- Consensus vs Injustice: Functionalism focuses on how society establishes consensus, as everyone benefits from everyone else doing their part, while conflict theory emphasizes the ongoing inequality in society and the need for change.
- Social Control: Functionalism accepts social control as functional to society, while conflict theory criticizes social controls as primarily serving the interests of the powerful.
- Inequality: Functionalism minimizes the ways in which social institutions contribute to social inequality, while conflict theory emphasizes that the various parts of society contribute to ongoing inequality.
- Social Change: Functionalism prefers slow social change, as rapid changes threaten social order, while conflict theory sees radical change as key to actualizing an egalitarian society.
- Key Proponents: Key functionalist thinkers include Emile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons, while conflict theory is influenced by the works of Karl Marx and Max Weber.
In summary, while functionalism focuses on the roles of social institutions in maintaining stability and consensus, conflict theory is more critical of social structures and emphasizes the need for change to reduce inequality and establish a more just society.
Comparative Table: Functionalism vs Conflict Theory
Functionalism and conflict theory are two different approaches used in sociology to analyze society and human behavior. Here is a table summarizing the key differences between the two theories:
Functionalism | Conflict Theory |
---|---|
Society is understood as a system consisting of different subsections that have specific functions. | Society is understood as a system characterized by unequal distribution of resources and power, leading to conflict and social change. |
Focuses on how society establishes consensus and maintains stability through social institutions. | Emphasizes social inequality, power struggles, and social change through conflict. |
Individual contributes to the society's overall performance. | Due to competition for resources, society is in a state of perpetual conflict. |
Slow social change is preferred, as rapid changes threaten social order. | Radical change is seen as key in actualizing an egalitarian society. |
Key proponents include Emile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons. | Key proponents include Karl Marx, Max Weber, and C. Wright Mills. |
Focuses on positive interdependence between elements in society. | Focuses on social inequality and domination of the powerful. |
Both functionalism and conflict theory are macro theories, which means they attempt to explain how societies work as a whole, rather than focusing on specific individuals or events.
- Functionalism vs Neofunctionalism
- Structuralism vs Functionalism
- Functionalism vs Behaviorism
- Conflict vs Consensus Theory
- War vs Conflict
- System Theory vs Contingency Theory
- Structuralism vs Formalism
- Sociology vs Psychology
- Frustration vs Conflict
- Anthropology vs Sociology
- Traditional Approach vs Modern Approach on Conflict
- Consequentialism vs Utilitarianism
- Role Conflict vs Role Strain
- Conflict vs Controversy
- Marxism vs Socialism
- Marxism vs Liberalism
- Determinism vs Fatalism
- Pragmatism vs Progressivism
- Constructivism vs Constructionism