What is the Difference Between JavaScript and TypeScript?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚JavaScript and TypeScript are both popular programming languages, but they have some key differences:
- Typing: TypeScript is a statically-typed language, while JavaScript is a dynamically-typed language. This means that type correctness can be checked at compile time in TypeScript, reducing the likelihood of runtime errors. In contrast, JavaScript does not support static typing, and type checking is done at runtime.
- Interfaces: TypeScript supports interfaces, which allow for better code organization and abstraction. JavaScript does not have this feature.
- Tooling: TypeScript comes with additional features that make it a more robust language for large-scale applications, such as the ability to annotate code with decorators and modularize components through the use of classes. JavaScript does not have these features.
- Readability and Maintainability: TypeScript is more readable and maintainable than JavaScript due to its static typing and other language features.
- Compilation: TypeScript code is compiled into JavaScript before execution. This means that TypeScript can seamlessly support existing JavaScript code and integrate with popular JavaScript libraries.
- ECMAScript Compliance: TypeScript helps you create JavaScript code that can run in any environment that supports ECMAScript, which ensures cross-platform compatibility.
- Learning Curve: TypeScript has a higher learning curve compared to JavaScript due to its additional features and stricter type checking. JavaScript has a lower learning curve and is more forgiving during development.
In summary, TypeScript is a more feature-rich and technically sound language compared to JavaScript, but it comes with a higher learning curve and may require more time to write code. JavaScript is more flexible and easier to learn, making it suitable for smaller projects or projects with tighter deadlines. Ultimately, the choice between JavaScript and TypeScript depends on the project requirements and the developer's preferences.
Comparative Table: JavaScript vs TypeScript
Here is a table highlighting the differences between JavaScript and TypeScript:
Feature | JavaScript | TypeScript |
---|---|---|
Typing | Dynamically-typed | Static and dynamic (optional) typed |
Namespaces | N/A | Available for grouping types under a single name |
Modularity | Uses import and export statements | Improved compiler checking for imports and exports across files |
Coding Conventions | Follows JavaScript conventions | Adds new conventions, such as PascalCase for types, interfaces, and enums |
Type Safety | No type safety | Static type safety, providing compiler errors |
Optional Properties | No support for optional properties | Allows marking object properties as optional when defining types |
Generics | No support for generics | Provides generics for reusable components by abstracting concrete types |
Decorators | No support for decorators | Supports decorators for attaching metadata to classes and functions |
Enums | No support for enums | Offers enum types for defining sets of named constants |
While TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript and shares many features, it introduces several new concepts, such as static typing, namespaces, generics, decorators, and enums.
- TypeScript vs ES6
- Java vs JavaScript
- JavaScript vs jQuery
- null vs undefined in JavaScript
- C vs C#
- Ajax vs jQuery
- Java vs C++
- PHP vs Python
- C vs C++
- PHP vs HTML
- Java vs C language
- ASP vs PHP
- HTML vs CSS
- Functional Programming vs Imperative Programming
- Android vs Java
- JSP vs Servlets
- Chinese vs Japanese Language
- Type vs Kind
- Python vs C Language