What is the Difference Between Keratosis Obturans and Cholesteatoma?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Keratosis obturans and cholesteatoma are two distinct conditions that affect the external auditory canal (EAC). They have different clinical presentations, physical findings, and treatments:
Keratosis Obturans:
- Characterized by an accumulation of obstructive desquamated keratin in the EAC.
- Associated with a greatly widened ear canal from circumferential erosion of bone.
- There is an associated hyperplasia of the underlying epithelium and evidence of chronic inflammation.
- No evidence of erosion or necrosis of the underlying bone.
- Can be managed successfully by regular aural toilet.
Cholesteatoma:
- Characterized by an invasion and erosion of squamous epithelium into a localized area of the bony ear canal.
- Associated with extensive erosion of the bony lined with stratified squamous keratinizing epithelium, that arises lateral to the tympanic membrane and is located in the inferior portion of the bony EAC.
- Frequently evidence of sequestration of the underlying bone.
- May require surgical intervention depending on the extent of the condition.
While both disorders have some overlapping characteristics, they are considered separate entities with distinct features. The presence of osteonecrosis and focal sequestration of the underlying bone are indicators that differentiate cholesteatoma from keratosis obturans.
Comparative Table: Keratosis Obturans vs Cholesteatoma
Here is a table comparing the differences between keratosis obturans and cholesteatoma:
Feature | Keratosis Obturans | Cholesteatoma |
---|---|---|
Definition | A medical condition resulting in the build-up of keratin in the ear canal. | A medical condition characterized by an abnormal collection of skin cells deep inside the ear. |
Cause | Caused due to a problem with how skin cells in the ear canal are produced. | Caused due to improper ear drainage, pressure in the ear, ruptures, and birth abnormalities. |
Diagnosis | Diagnosed through regular aural toilet. | Diagnosed through health history, examination with an otoscope, audiogram, CT scan, and MRI. |
Treatment | Can be managed successfully by regular aural toilet. | May require surgical intervention depending on the extent of the condition. |
Overlap | Shares some overlapping characteristics with cholesteatoma, making it difficult to differentiate between the two conditions. | Distinct from keratosis obturans, but shares some overlapping characteristics. |
While both keratosis obturans and cholesteatoma are separate entities with distinct characteristics, they do share some overlapping features, which can make it challenging to differentiate between them.
- Actinic Keratosis vs Seborrheic Keratosis
- Keratoacanthoma vs Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Hyperkeratosis vs Parakeratosis
- Keratosis Pilaris vs Folliculitis
- Tobacco Pouch Keratosis vs Leukoplakia
- Sebaceous Cyst vs Epidermoid Cyst
- Actinic Keratosis vs Bowen’s Disease
- Strawberry Legs vs Keratosis Pilaris
- Hordeolum vs Chalazion
- Thyroglossal Cyst vs Goitre
- Blepharochalasis vs Dermatochalasis
- Ceruminous vs Meibomian Glands
- Hydatidiform Mole vs Choriocarcinoma
- Dermoid vs Epidermoid Cyst
- Dermatophytosis vs Dermatomycosis
- Mole vs Skin Cancer
- Keratinocytes vs Corneocytes
- Furuncle vs Folliculitis
- Enchondroma vs Chondrosarcoma