What is the Difference Between Kolb and Gibbs Reflective Cycle?

The main difference between Kolb and Gibbs reflective cycles lies in the number of stages involved in each model. Both models are used to facilitate learning through experience and reflection. Here are the key differences between the two models:

Kolb's Reflective Cycle:

• Developed by David Kolb
• Consists of four stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation
• Focuses on learning through experience

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle:

• Developed by Graham Gibbs
• Consists of six stages: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, and action plan
• Focuses on learning through repetition and reflection
• Often referred to as an iterative model

While Kolb's model emphasizes learning through experience and is sometimes referred to as an experiential learning model, Gibbs' model is geared towards learning through repetition and reflection, also known as an iterative model. Gibbs' cycle is an expansion of Kolb's cycle, with two additional stages (description and feelings) added to provide a more structured and detailed approach to reflection.

Comparative Table: Kolb vs Gibbs Reflective Cycle

The main difference between Kolb and Gibbs reflective cycles lies in the number of stages involved in each model. Here is a table comparing the two models:

Kolb's reflective cycle, published in 1984 by David A. Kolb, follows a linear pattern of experiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting. On the other hand, Gibbs' reflective cycle, published in 1988 by Graham Gibbs, is an expanded and more detailed version of Kolb's cycle. It introduces additional steps to remedy the perceived narrowness and underdevelopment of the Kolb cycle. While both models focus on reflective learning, Gibbs' model includes more specific stages, making it more comprehensive and adaptable to different learning situations.