What is the Difference Between Logical Possibility and Metaphysical Possibility?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Logical possibility and metaphysical possibility are two distinct concepts in the field of modal logic. They differ in terms of their relationship with logical constraints and the nature of the objects or properties being considered. Here are the main differences between the two:
- Logical Possibility: This refers to the conception in a human mind of something that does not imply a contradiction. A statement is considered logically possible if there are no contradicting words or phrases in it. Logical possibility is based on the structure of the sentence and the absence of contradictions, regardless of the nature of the objects or properties being considered.
- Metaphysical Possibility: This is a more intrinsic principle that exists outside of our minds, making some activity possible. Metaphysical possibility is a subset of logical possibilities, as it includes the logical constraints and some additional constraints related to the nature of the objects or properties being considered. Metaphysical possibility is about examining the possibility of something in some possible world, considering the nature of the described thing and its being or existing.
In summary, logical possibility focuses on the structure and coherence of a statement, while metaphysical possibility goes beyond logical coherence to consider the nature of the objects or properties being discussed and their relationship to our world or other possible worlds. Some claims may be logically possible but not metaphysically possible due to the additional constraints imposed by the nature of the objects or properties involved.
Comparative Table: Logical Possibility vs Metaphysical Possibility
Here is a table comparing the differences between logical possibility and metaphysical possibility:
Feature | Logical Possibility | Metaphysical Possibility |
---|---|---|
Definition | A statement is considered logically possible if there are no contradictions in its structure and no contradictory words. | A statement is considered metaphysically possible if it is consistent with the laws or facts of metaphysics, which are not necessarily based on empirical observation or experimentation. |
Contradictions | Logically possible statements cannot contain contradictions. | Metaphysically possible statements may contain contradictions, as they are based on philosophical assumptions rather than empirical evidence. |
Relationship | Logical possibility is a subset of metaphysical possibility, meaning everything that is metaphysically possible is also logically possible, but not vice versa. | Metaphysical possibility deals with abstract concepts and philosophical assumptions, making it a broader concept than logical possibility. |
Examples | 1. "Julian is sickly" is logically possible because there are no contradictions in the statement. | 1. The existence of a god or supernatural beings is metaphysically possible, as it is based on philosophical assumptions rather than empirical evidence. |
In summary, logical possibility deals with statements that are free from contradictions in their structure and words, while metaphysical possibility deals with abstract concepts and philosophical assumptions that may contain contradictions. Logical possibility is a subset of metaphysical possibility, meaning everything that is metaphysically possible is also logically possible, but not vice versa.
- Physics vs Metaphysics
- Probability vs Possibility
- Positivism vs Logical Positivism
- Possible vs Probable
- Logical vs Rational
- Logic vs Reason
- Likelihood vs Probability
- Conceptual vs Logical Model
- Philosophy vs Theosophy
- Metaethics vs Normative Ethics
- Philosophy vs Psychology
- Philosophy vs Science
- Symbol vs Metaphor
- Practicable vs Practical
- Metaphor vs Allegory
- Metaphor vs Metonymy
- Metaphor vs Analogy
- Logical vs Physical Data Model
- Idealism vs Naturalism