What is the Difference Between Mali-400MP GPU and Tegra 2?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between the Mali-400MP GPU and the Tegra 2 lies in the fact that the Mali-400MP is a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) developed by ARM, while the Tegra 2 is a mobile CPU developed by NVIDIA that contains an integrated GPU.
- Mali-400MP GPU: This GPU supports a wide range of applications, from mobile user interfaces to smartbooks, HDTV, and mobile gaming. It is scalable from one to four cores and provides high performance support for various graphics-related tasks.
- Tegra 2: This is a System-on-Chip (SoC) developed by NVIDIA for mobile devices such as smartphones, personal digital assistants, and mobile Internet devices. It features a dual-core CPU and an integrated GPU, which NVIDIA claims is the first mobile dual-core CPU. Tegra 2 also contains a 1080p Video Playback Processor, allowing users to watch 1080p HD movies.
Benchmark tests performed by Anandtech show that the Mali-400MP GPU is slightly behind NVIDIA's Tegra 2 in performance. Both GPUs are part of the second generation of graphics processing units, with the Mali-400MP being older and less advanced than the Tegra 3.
Comparative Table: Mali-400MP GPU vs Tegra 2
The main difference between the Mali-400MP GPU and the Tegra 2 lies in the fact that the Mali-400MP is a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) developed by ARM, while the Tegra 2 is a mobile CPU developed by Nvidia that contains a GPU. Here is a comparison table of the key differences between the two:
Feature | Mali-400MP GPU | Tegra 2 |
---|---|---|
Developer | ARM | Nvidia |
Type | GPU | Mobile CPU with integrated GPU |
Use Cases | Mobile user interfaces, smartbooks, HDTV, mobile gaming | Mobile devices such as smartphones, PDAs, MIDs |
Programmable Architecture | Yes | No |
Single Driver Stack | Yes | No |
Tile-based Deferred Rendering | Yes | No |
Local Buffering Efficient Alpha Blending | Yes | No |
Full Scene Anti-Aliasing (FSAA) | Yes | No |
1080p Video Playback Processor | No | Yes |
Mali-400MP GPU supports a wide range of use cases, from mobile user interfaces to smartbooks, HDTV, and mobile gaming. It has a programmable architecture, a single driver stack for all multi-core configurations, and features like tile-based deferred rendering, local buffering efficient alpha blending of multiple layers in hardware, and Full Scene Anti-Aliasing (FSAA).
On the other hand, Tegra 2 is a System-on-Chip (SoC) developed for mobile devices and contains a GPU as part of the package. It also includes a 1080p Video Playback Processor, allowing users to watch 1080p HD movies stored on their devices. However, Tegra 2 does not support the programmable architecture, single driver stack, or the advanced features like Mali-400MP.
- Mali-400MP GPU vs Adreno 220 GPU
- PowerVR SGX543MP2 vs Mali-400MP
- NVIDIA Tegra 2 vs Tegra 3
- NVIDIA Tegra 2 vs Apple A5
- Apple A4 vs NVIDIA Tegra 2
- Samsung Exynos 4210 vs NVIDIA Tegra 2
- Quad core Nvidia Kal-El (Tegra 3) vs Nvidia Tegra 2
- NVIDIA Tegra 2 Dual Core vs Tegra 3 Quad Core (Kal-El) Mobile Processors
- NVIDIA Tegra 3 vs Samsung Exynos 4210
- NVIDIA Tegra3 vs TI OMAP4460
- Apple A5 vs NVIDIA Tegra 3
- Apple A5X vs Nvidia Tegra 3 Processors
- PowerVR SGX543MP2 vs Adreno 220
- T-Mobile MyTouch 4G vs T-Mobile G2
- Huawei MediaPad vs iPad 2
- Ghana vs Mali
- T-Mobile G-Slate vs iPad 2
- T-Mobile G2X vs Galaxy S 4G
- MPEG2 vs MPEG4