What is the Difference Between Molecular Solid and Covalent Network Solid?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between molecular solids and covalent network solids lies in the nature of the bonding and the properties that result from these bonds.
Molecular Solids:
- Held together by Van der Waals forces, such as London dispersion forces.
- Relatively soft materials.
- Lower melting points compared to covalent network solids.
- Electrical insulators.
- Examples include water ice and organic molecular solids.
Covalent Network Solids:
- Held together by covalent bonding, forming a continuous network of chemical bonds.
- Very hard materials.
- High melting points due to the strength of the covalent bonds.
- Low electrical conductivity at the liquid state and the solid state, depending on the composition.
- Examples include diamond and silica.
In summary, molecular solids are relatively soft and have lower melting points, while covalent network solids are hard and have high melting points. Molecular solids are electrical insulators, whereas covalent network solids can have varying electrical conductivity depending on the specific composition.
Comparative Table: Molecular Solid vs Covalent Network Solid
Here is a table comparing molecular solids and covalent network solids:
Property | Molecular Solids | Covalent Network Solids |
---|---|---|
Definition | Molecular solids are made from individual separate molecules held together by intermolecular forces. | Covalent network solids are formed by networks or chains of atoms or molecules held together by covalent bonds, creating a single giant molecule or a continuous network of chemical bonds. |
Structure | Molecular solids have a structure where each molecule is surrounded by other molecules, with intermolecular forces holding them together. | Covalent network solids have a continuous network of covalent bonds, where all atoms are covalently bonded together in a three-dimensional structure. |
Examples | Examples of molecular solids include dry ice (CO2) and naphthalene. | Examples of covalent network solids include diamond, silica, and silicon carbide. |
Melting Point | Molecular solids generally have lower melting points, as the intermolecular forces are weaker than covalent bonds. | Covalent network solids have high melting points due to the strength of the covalent bonds. |
Hardness | Molecular solids are typically soft or at least not as hard as covalent network solids. | Covalent network solids are usually hard and rigid, or soft in the case of two-dimensional networks like graphite. |
In summary, molecular solids are composed of individual molecules held together by intermolecular forces, while covalent network solids are formed by networks or chains of atoms or molecules held together by covalent bonds. Covalent network solids have a continuous network structure, higher melting points, and are usually harder than molecular solids.
- Ionic vs Molecular Solids
- Covalent vs Polar Covalent
- Ionic vs Covalent Bonds
- Coordinate Covalent Bond vs Covalent Bond
- Covalent vs Noncovalent Bonds
- Electrovalent vs Covalent Bond
- Ionic vs Covalent Compounds
- Electrovalency vs Covalency
- Ionic vs Molecular Compounds
- Hydrogen Bond vs Covalent Bond
- Ionic Covalent vs Metallic Hydrides
- Polar vs Nonpolar Covalent Bonds
- Covalent Organic vs Metal Organic Framework
- Amorphous vs Crystalline Solid
- Supramolecular Chemistry vs Molecular Chemistry
- Liquid vs Solid
- Molecular vs Metallic Hydrogen
- Covalent Radius vs Metallic Radius
- Molecule vs Lattice