What is the Difference Between Nanopore and Illumina Sequencing?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Nanopore and Illumina sequencing are two powerful sequencing technologies that can be used to sequence DNA and RNA molecules. They offer high-throughput sequencing capabilities and are suitable for whole-genome sequencing for various organisms. However, there are significant differences between the two technologies:
- Sequencing method: Illumina sequencing utilizes a reversible dye terminator technique, while nanopore sequencing uses protein nanopores to detect changes in the current of a DNA or RNA molecule.
- Read length: Illumina sequencing produces shorter read lengths, typically up to 500 base pairs (bp), whereas nanopore sequencing excels at producing long read lengths, extending into the hundreds of kilobases range.
- Strengths: Illumina sequencing is known for its exceptional accuracy (read accuracy of >99.9%), high throughput, and robust infrastructure. Nanopore sequencing, on the other hand, offers the advantages of long read lengths, real-time analysis, and portability.
- Accuracy: Illumina sequencing is generally more accurate than nanopore sequencing. For example, Illumina sequencers have a read accuracy of >99.9%, while Oxford Nanopore sequencers have a read accuracy of around 97%.
In summary, both Illumina and nanopore sequencing technologies have their strengths and weaknesses. Researchers should consider the specific requirements of their projects, such as read length, accuracy, and sequencing method, when choosing between the two technologies. In some cases, using both Illumina and nanopore sequencing technologies in combination can provide the most comprehensive insight into genomic data.
Comparative Table: Nanopore vs Illumina Sequencing
Here is a table comparing the differences between Nanopore and Illumina sequencing:
Feature | Nanopore Sequencing | Illumina Sequencing |
---|---|---|
Generation | Third-generation | Second-generation |
Read Length | Long reads | Short reads |
Accuracy | 92-97% | >99.9% |
Technology | Nanopore | Sequencing-by-synthesis |
Real-time Analysis | Yes | No |
Portability | Portable devices | Not as portable |
Read Accuracy | Lower | Higher |
Both Nanopore and Illumina sequencing are high-throughput sequencing methods, providing researchers with reliable data in rapid timeframes. They are suitable for whole-genome sequencing, from small to large organisms, with different sequencing read lengths depending on the technology used. However, there are some key differences between the two:
- Generation: Nanopore sequencing is a third-generation sequencing technique, while Illumina sequencing is a second-generation technique.
- Read Length: Nanopore sequencing generates long reads of DNA sequence, while Illumina sequencing generates short reads.
- Accuracy: Illumina sequencers tend to have a higher read accuracy (>99.9%) compared to Nanopore sequencers (92-97%).
- Technology: Nanopore sequencing uses nanopores to detect the sequence of DNA molecules, while Illumina sequencing uses reversible dye terminators in a sequencing-by-synthesis approach.
- Real-time Analysis: Nanopore sequencing allows for real-time analysis, which is not possible with Illumina sequencing.
- Portability: Nanopore sequencers are more portable than Illumina sequencers, enabling real-time analysis of data in the field.
Both sequencing methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and a better understanding of why and when each method should be used is key for unlocking the most comprehensive insight into genomic data.
- NGS vs Sanger Sequencing
- Microarray vs Next Generation Sequencing
- PCR vs DNA Sequencing
- Whole Genome Sequencing vs Exome Sequencing
- Microarray vs RNA Sequencing
- Shotgun Sequencing vs Next Generation Sequencing
- Genotyping vs Sequencing
- Exome vs RNA Sequencing
- Sanger Sequencing vs Pyrosequencing
- Gene Mapping vs Gene Sequencing
- Gene Sequencing vs DNA Fingerprinting
- Nanotechnology vs Nanoscience
- Hierarchical vs Whole Genome Shotgun Sequencing
- PCR Primers vs Sequencing Primers
- DNA Profiling vs DNA Sequencing
- NGS vs WGS
- Nano vs Micro
- Clone by Clone Sequencing vs Shotgun Sequencing
- Nanoparticles vs Nanoclusters