What is the Difference Between Parametric and Non Parametric?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between parametric and non-parametric methods lies in the assumptions they make about the underlying population distribution.
Parametric methods are based on assumptions about the distribution of the population from which the sample was taken. They typically require that the data follows a specific distribution, such as a normal distribution. Some key characteristics of parametric methods include:
- Rely on assumptions about the shape or parameters of the population distribution.
- Most common parametric assumption is that data are approximately normally distributed.
- Require less data compared to non-parametric methods.
- Perform well when assumptions are met, but can lead to incorrect conclusions if assumptions are strongly violated.
Non-parametric methods, on the other hand, do not rely on assumptions about the shape or parameters of the underlying population distribution. They are more flexible and can handle a wider range of situations. Some key characteristics of non-parametric methods include:
- Do not assume anything about the underlying distribution.
- Applicable for both variables and attributes.
- Generally require more data than parametric methods.
- Can be used with data that has outliers.
- Perform well in many cases and are necessary in some, but they are not a perfect solution.
In summary, parametric methods are more powerful and efficient when the data meets the assumptions, while non-parametric methods are more flexible and can handle a wider range of situations. If the assumptions of a parametric method are not valid, it is recommended to use an analogous non-parametric method instead.
Comparative Table: Parametric vs Non Parametric
Here is a table comparing parametric and non-parametric methods:
Parametric Methods | Non-Parametric Methods |
---|---|
Make assumptions about a population's parameters | Do not assume anything about the underlying distribution |
Assume a normal distribution or can approximate it using a normal distribution | Do not assume a specific distribution |
Require less data than non-parametric methods | Require more data than parametric methods |
Perform well when assumptions are met, but may be less powerful when assumptions are violated | Can have more statistical power when assumptions of parametric tests are violated |
Can be less flexible in modeling with confounding factors | Can be more flexible in modeling with confounding factors |
Mainly used for group mean comparisons | Mainly used for median comparisons and applicable for both variables and attributes |
Suitable for interval or ratio data | Suitable for original data and can handle ordinal, nominal, and interval (continuous) data |
Can be affected by outliers | Less affected by outliers |
Parametric methods make assumptions about a population's parameters and assume a normal distribution or can approximate it using a normal distribution. They require less data than non-parametric methods and perform well when assumptions are met. On the other hand, non-parametric methods do not assume anything about the underlying distribution, require more data than parametric methods, and can be used for various data types, including ordinal, nominal, and interval (continuous) data. They are also less affected by outliers and can be more flexible in modeling with confounding factors.
- Variable vs Parameter
- Linear Equation vs Nonlinear Equation
- Linear vs Nonlinear Differential Equations
- Scientific vs Non-Scientific Research
- Parameter vs Statistic
- Quantitative vs Qualitative
- Static vs Non Static Method
- Mathematics vs Statistics
- Linear vs Nonlinear Data Structures
- Normative vs Empirical
- Poisson Distribution vs Normal Distribution
- Binomial vs Normal Distribution
- Uniform vs Nonuniform Quantization
- Attribute vs Parameter
- Linear vs Nonlinear Text
- Qualitative vs Quantitative Research
- Gaussian vs Normal Distribution
- Variable vs Random Variable
- Probability vs Statistics