What is the Difference Between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens are both bacterial species belonging to the Pseudomonas genus, but they have distinct characteristics and effects on humans and the environment. The main differences between the two are:
- Pathogenicity: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen, causing infections in plants, animals, and humans, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. In contrast, Pseudomonas fluorescens is not a human pathogen but is known for promoting plant growth.
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Traits: The two species have different growth characteristics and physical appearance. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa can grow at 42°C, while Pseudomonas fluorescens prefers lower temperatures, and its smell is putrid compared to the sweet smell of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- Genome Size: The pan-genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa comprises 7,824 genes, while the pan-genome of Pseudomonas fluorescens is larger, with 13,782 genes.
- Resistance Mechanisms: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known for its antibiotic resistance, which can make it difficult to treat. The resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas fluorescens are less well-established due to the scattered records of antimicrobial resistance.
- Microbiology: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a well-studied human pathogen with a known role in causing infections, while Pseudomonas fluorescens is more environmentally-focused, with strains reclassified as novel Pseudomonas species within the Pseudomonas fluorescens "species complex".
In summary, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens differ in their pathogenicity, growth characteristics, genome size, and resistance mechanisms. P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen, while P. fluorescens is primarily associated with plant growth promotion and environmental niches.
Comparative Table: Pseudomonas aeruginosa vs Pseudomonas fluorescens
Here is a table comparing the differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens:
Feature | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Pseudomonas fluorescens |
---|---|---|
Clinical Importance | More studied due to clinical relevance | Less studied, considered an opportunistic pathogen |
Environmental Niches | Found in various environments, including human-impacted sites | Occupies different environmental niches |
Antimicrobial Resistance | Intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms | Low occurrence of transferable resistance mechanisms |
Core Genome | Shares 2,789 genes with the P. fluorescens species complex | Has a core genome with only 20 unique genes within the Pseudomonas genus |
Functional Traits | Produces bioactive secondary metabolites, siderophores, and a type III secretion system; forms biofilms | Generally not considered a pathogen in humans |
Please note that the information on Pseudomonas aeruginosa is more extensive due to its clinical importance, while Pseudomonas fluorescens is primarily known for its environmental presence and less frequent pathogenic roles.
- Pseudomonas Aeruginosa vs Pseudomonas Putida
- Pseudomonas Aeruginosa vs Enterobacteriaceae
- Pseudomonas Aeruginosa vs Alcaligenes Fecalis
- E. Coli vs Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
- Pseudomonas vs Staphylococcus
- Klebsiella vs Pseudomonas
- Pseudomonas vs Burkholderia
- Hyphae vs Pseudohyphae
- Burkholderia Mallei vs Pseudomallei
- Bacteria vs Cyanobacteria
- Green vs Purple Sulfur Bacteria
- Aspergillus Niger vs Aspergillus Flavus
- Azotobacter vs Azospirillum
- Staphylococcus Aureus vs Staphylococcus Saprophyticus
- Photoluminescence vs Fluorescence
- Halogens vs Pseudohalogens
- Bacteria vs Fungi
- Klebsiella pneumoniae vs Streptococcus pneumoniae
- Bacteriochlorophyll vs Chlorophyll