What is the Difference Between Pyroxene and Amphibole?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Pyroxene and amphibole are both types of silicate minerals, but they have distinct differences in their structures and compositions. The main differences between pyroxene and amphibole include:
- Silicate Structure: Pyroxenes have a single-chain silicate structure, while amphiboles have a double-chain silicate structure.
- Chemical Composition: Pyroxenes are primarily composed of single-chain silicate tetrahedra, while amphiboles contain double-chain silicate tetrahedra.
- Crystal Shapes: In general, pyroxene crystals tend to be stubbier than the more elongated amphibole crystals.
- Cleavage: The best way to distinguish between pyroxenes and amphiboles is by the angle between cleavage planes. Pyroxene cleavage faces tend to meet at nearly right angles, while amphibole cleavage faces meet at angles of nearly 60 degrees and 120 degrees.
- Cross-sections: When looking down the long axis of a cleavage fragment, pyroxenes have rectangular cross-sections, while amphiboles exhibit a diamond- or wedge-shaped pattern.
- Fracture/Cleavage: Amphiboles, like hornblende, tend to have a more splintery fracture/cleavage than pyroxenes.
Some common examples of pyroxene minerals include augite and diopside, while amphibole minerals include hornblende, actinolite, and tremolite.
Comparative Table: Pyroxene vs Amphibole
The main difference between pyroxene and amphibole lies in their silicate structures. Pyroxene is a single-chain inosilicate, while amphibole is a double-chain inosilicate. Here is a comparison table highlighting the differences between pyroxene and amphibole:
Property | Pyroxene | Amphibole |
---|---|---|
Silicate Structure | Single-chain SiO3 tetrahedra | Double-chain SiO4 tetrahedra |
Chemical Composition | Generally contains calcium, magnesium, and iron | Contains iron or magnesium |
Color | Typically dark in color | Black or dark green |
Crystal Shape | Prismatic or blocky | Needle-like |
Cleavage Angle | Not characteristic | Characteristic cleavage angle of 56 and 124 degrees |
It is important not to use the terms pyroxene and amphibole interchangeably, as their distinct differences in physical and chemical properties can lead to misidentification of rocks and minerals, which can have significant implications in geologic studies and exploration.
- Pyrolusite vs Psilomelane
- Pyrite vs Chalcopyrite
- Biotite vs Hornblende
- Quartz vs Feldspar
- Ammonite vs Ammolite
- Ampholyte vs Amphoteric
- Orthoclase vs Plagioclase
- Pyrite vs Marcasite
- Gold vs Pyrite
- Obsidian vs Tourmaline
- Amethyst vs Alexandrite
- Ilmenite vs Perovskite
- Perlite vs Zeolite
- Silicate vs Non Silicate Minerals
- Geology vs Petrology
- Muscovite vs Biotite
- Igneous Rocks vs Metamorphic Rocks
- Calcite vs Quartz
- Calcite vs Dolomite