What is the Difference Between SIP and H323?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) and H.323 are both signaling protocols used for transmitting voice and multimedia over IP networks. They have some similarities in their use cases, such as video conferencing, telephony, and screen sharing, but there are key differences between the two protocols:
- Architecture: H.323 has a monolithic architecture, while SIP has a modular architecture. H.323 covers almost every service, including capability exchange, conference control, basic signaling, QoS, registration, service discovery, and more. In contrast, SIP is designed to be modular, with basic call signaling, user location, and registration as its core functions, and other features in separate orthogonal protocols.
- Scalability: H.323 has limited scalability, while SIP is better scalable and more flexible. This makes SIP more suitable for integrating with internet applications.
- Addressing: H.323 can use various address forms, including phone numbers (e.g., E.164), URIs, and email addresses. SIP, on the other hand, uses URIs for addressing.
- Complexity: H.323 is considered more complex than SIP in terms of implementation and adaptation. SIP is a human-readable protocol, making it simpler to develop and support software.
- Compatibility: H.323 is less compatible with the internet and more compatible with PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network). SIP is more compatible with the internet and less compatible with PSTN.
Despite their differences, both protocols are functionally equivalent when it comes to video conferencing solutions development. However, due to SIP's modular design, better scalability, and ease of implementation, it has become more popular and widely used than H.323.
Comparative Table: SIP vs H323
Here is a table comparing the differences between SIP and H.323:
Feature | H.323 | SIP |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Monolithic | Modular |
Scalability | Limited | Better scalable |
Flexibility | Little bit flexible | More flexible |
Instant Messaging | Does not provide | Provides |
Complexity | Absolute complex | Moderate complex |
Message Format | Binary | ASCII |
Compatibility | Not compatible with internet | Compatible with internet |
Dependency | Built entirely on telephone systems | Completely depends on internet connection |
PSTN Compatibility | Compatible | Not compatible |
Designer | ITU (International Telecommunication Union) | IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) |
H.323 is a phone-based system with a monolithic architecture, limited scalability, and little flexibility. It does not provide instant messaging and uses binary message formatting. It is compatible with PSTN and was designed by the ITU.
SIP, on the other hand, is a session layer protocol with a modular architecture, better scalability, and more flexibility. It provides instant messaging, uses ASCII message formatting, and is compatible with the internet. SIP depends on an internet connection and was designed by the IETF.
- VoIP vs SIP
- SIP vs SCCP
- IMS vs SIP
- SIP-I vs SIP-T
- SIP vs XMPP (Jabber)
- VoIP vs Skype
- VoIP vs Landline
- BICC vs SIP-I
- SIP vs BICC
- Google Voice vs Skype
- Skype vs Facetime
- HSDPA vs HSUPA
- CISCO Mobile vs CISCO Jabber vs CISCO WebEX
- Viber vs Skype
- Cisco Jabber vs WebEx
- Microsoft Skype vs Skype
- Skype vs Skype for Business
- TCP vs IP
- Tango vs Skype