What is the Difference Between Varchar and Nvarchar?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between VARCHAR and NVARCHAR lies in the character sets they support and their storage requirements. Here are the key differences:
- Character Set: VARCHAR stores non-Unicode or English character data types, supporting ASCII values and a maximum of 8000 characters. NVARCHAR, on the other hand, stores Unicode or non-English character data types, supporting ASCII values as well as special characters and a maximum of 4000 characters.
- Storage Size: VARCHAR is a variable-length data type that can use up to 8000 bytes of storage. NVARCHAR requires double the storage space, using 2 bytes for each character, which equates to 4000 bytes of storage.
- Use Cases: VARCHAR is suitable for storing non-Unicode characters, such as English letters and numbers. NVARCHAR is used for storing multilingual data, including characters from different languages, and requires less storage space for most characters in the Unicode range 0-65535.
In summary, the choice between VARCHAR and NVARCHAR depends on the project context, infrastructure, and database system being used. VARCHAR is typically used for storing non-Unicode characters, while NVARCHAR is used for storing Unicode or multilingual data.
Comparative Table: Varchar vs Nvarchar
Here is a table comparing the differences between VARCHAR and NVARCHAR:
Feature | VARCHAR | NVARCHAR |
---|---|---|
Character Data Type | Variable-length, non-Unicode characters | Variable-length, both Unicode and non-Unicode characters |
Storage Efficiency | More efficient storage, as it requires only 1 byte per character | Less efficient storage, as it requires 2 bytes per character |
Maximum Length | Supports up to 8,000 characters | Supports up to 4,000 characters |
Suitable for | Single language or script data | Multilingual data, including more than one language |
Storage Space | Uses single quotes for delimitation (e.g., 'Coding') | Uses 'N' as a prefix and double quotes for delimitation (e.g., N'Coding') |
Performance | Generally offers better performance | Generally offers slightly worse performance |
In summary, VARCHAR is more suitable for storing text data from a single language or script, offering better storage efficiency and performance. In contrast, NVARCHAR supports a wide range of characters from different languages and scripts, making it ideal for storing multilingual text data. The choice between VARCHAR and NVARCHAR depends on the project context, infrastructure, and database system.
- Char vs Varchar
- Unicode vs ASCII
- SQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- SQL vs T-SQL
- MySQL vs MS SQL Server
- SQL vs MySQL
- SQL Server vs Oracle
- Visual Basic vs Visual Basic.Net (VB6 vs VB.net)
- C vs C#
- PL-SQL vs T-SQL
- ODBC vs JDBC
- Verbs vs Nouns
- MySQL vs Oracle Databases
- SQL vs PL SQL
- SQL Server Express 2005 vs SQL Server Express 2008
- PHP vs .NET
- ODBC vs OLEDB
- MS SQL Server 2008 vs 2008 R2
- Database vs Schema