What is the Difference Between Due To and Because Of?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The difference between "due to" and "because of" lies in their grammatical functions and the type of word they modify. Here are the key distinctions:

  1. Due to:
  • Functions as an adjective, modifying nouns or noun phrases.
  • Presents a reason for a noun.
  • Should come after a noun or noun phrase.
  • Can be replaced with "caused by".
  1. Because of:
  • Functions as an adverb, modifying verbs or adjectives.
  • Presents a reason for a verb or an adjective.
  • Should come after a verb or an adjective.

Examples:

  • Correct: The cancellation was due to rain.
  • Incorrect: The cancellation was due to because of rain.
  • Correct: The business failed because of its poor location.
  • Incorrect: The business failed due to its poor location.

In summary, "due to" should be used to modify nouns and present reasons for a noun, while "because of" should be used to modify verbs or adjectives and present reasons for an action or state.

Comparative Table: Due To vs Because Of

The phrases "due to" and "because of" both show a cause-and-effect relationship, but they are not grammatically equivalent. Here is a table summarizing the differences between the two phrases:

Feature Due to Because of
Function Modifies nouns Modifies verbs
Example 1. The traffic jam was due to a terrible accident. The cancellation was because of heavy rain.
Example 2. The cancellation was due to poor management. The smoke in the home was because of the burning cake.

"Due to" is used to modify nouns and should come after a noun, while "because of" is used to modify verbs and should come after a verb. Note that the short sentence "Due to heavy rain, the trip was canceled" is considered incorrect, as "due to" should not be used to modify a verb. In everyday speech, the distinction between "due to" and "because of" may not be crucial, but in formal writing, it is essential to use the correct phrase.