Author
Home > Business > What is the Difference Between Hard and Soft HRM?

Guilherme Mazui

•3 minutes to read

What is the Difference Between Hard and Soft HRM?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between hard and soft HRM lies in their approach to managing employees and their focus on either the organization's goals or the employees' well-being and development.

Hard HRM is characterized by:

  1. Treating employees as valuable resources or commodities to achieve organizational goals.
  2. Focusing on administrative tasks and immediate requirements.
  3. Implementing strict performance metrics, one-way communication, and a hierarchical management system.
  4. Minimal focus on employees' needs for self-actualization and lower wages.

Soft HRM is characterized by:

  1. Emphasizing the human element of work and treating employees as individuals with inherent ambitions and emotions.
  2. Focusing on strategic concerns and long-term business and workforce planning.
  3. Implementing two-way communication, higher wages, investing in employee wellbeing, and training and career development programs.
  4. A more democratic and collaborative management style.

In practice, most organizations need a balance between hard and soft HRM to achieve their goals while considering employees' needs and well-being. The optimal balance may vary depending on the size, culture, and industry of the organization.

On this page
  • What is the Difference Between Hard and Soft HRM?
  • Comparative Table: Hard vs Soft HRM

    • Comparative Table: Hard vs Soft HRM

    Here is a table summarizing the key differences between hard and soft HRM:

    Trait Hard HRM Soft HRM
    Employer Perspective Employees are a resource Employees are individuals to invest in
    Management Style Focuses on tasks and micromanagement Collaborates with, guides, and leads people
    Employee Needs Employees as commodities to help the company meet goals Employees' needs and ambitions are important factors
    Approach to Work Task-oriented, focused on immediate requirements and efficiency Strategic, focused on employee development and engagement
    Training and Development May not prioritize employee training and development Prioritizes employee training and development
    Employee Involvement Limited employee involvement in decision-making Encourages employee involvement in decision-making
    Performance Metrics Emphasizes strict performance metrics Emphasizes more flexible, human-centered metrics

    Both hard and soft HRM methods have their pros and cons, and it's essential to consider the specific context of a company to determine which approach is more suitable. It's also possible to combine elements of both strategies to achieve the best results in a given situation.

    Read more:

    Guilherme Mazui

    Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.